Dave's Radio Blog and Other News Archives
Editor: David Tanny
Home, Latest News, 2002 Archives, E-Mail Bookmark and Share

Picking on Clear Channel

  • Clear Channel Communications denied abusing its market power and battled criticism that it is homogenizing the airwaves in a three-and-one-half hour congressional hearing Thursday (read LA Times 1)  (read LA Times 2) (read 1)  (read 2)  (read USA Today)  (read WSJ)   (read ABC)  (read 3)  (read 4)  (read 5)
  • Clear Channel Defends Itself and Radio Deregulation
  • UPDATE - Clear Channel tells Congress it's no bully
  • Clear Channel Applauds Senator John McCain's Bill to Diversify Media Ownership
  • [audio] Rush From Limbaugh Has Advertisers in Flight [0.9 min]
  • Clear Channel CEO Visits Capitol Hill
  • Kurt Hanson: DMCA and SWSA Are Stifling Internet Radio
  • L.A. Times: Clear Channel Fights Efforts to Curtail Expansion
  • L.A. Times: Clear Channel Is Facing a Lot of Static Inside the Capitol (thanks to L.A., CA)
  • Radio: Where's the Diversity? - In the wake of radio deregulation, consumer groups and industry executives lock horns over how to solve the problem of the same songs blaring over the airwaves. Policy makers are eager to enter the fray. Michael Grebb reports from Washington.
  • Salon: Clear Channel Hits the Skids
  • Dotinga: Murky Water for Clear Channel - Despite its dominant position in the U.S. radio market, all is not smooth sailing for the radio behemoth. Congress, uneasy at how large companies like Clear Channel have become, is considering legislation that would promote competition. Third of a three-part report by Randy Dotinga.
  • Dotinga: Voice-Tracked DJs - Your DJ may sound like he's just around the corner, but thanks to Clear Channel Communications and its "cyberjock" technology, he's probably even not in the same time zone. Second of a three-part report by Randy Dotinga.
  • Clear-Cutting the Radio Forest - Clear Channel Communications is changing the face of radio broadcasting, buying stations left and right, firing local DJs and replacing original programming with bland, formatted material. Nowhere is that more apparent than in San Diego. First of a three-part report by Randy Dotinga.
  • Bobby Rich ponders post RM CC
  • Feingold vs CC
  • Clear Channel's reach is a concern-Jim Walsh and Brian Lambert
  • Salon: Is Clear Channel selling hit singles?
  • Mega Hurts: Clear Channel's big radio ways are getting a lot of static
  • Pay for play - Why does radio suck? Because most stations play only the songs the record companies pay them to. And things are going to get worse. By Eric Boehlert
  • Radio's big bully - Dirty tricks and crappy programming: Welcome to the world of Clear Channel, the biggest station owner in America. By Eric Boehlert
  • The "Bootylicious" gambit - Can a hot new single from Destiny's Child help Columbia Records crack the indie promoters' control of pop radio? By Eric Boehlert
  • One big happy channel? - The Telecommunications Reform Act handed overcontrol of the radio airwaves to a chosen few. Will TV be next? By Eric Boehlert
  • What's wrong with the music biz? - Napster's out of the picture, but for the first time in a decade, album sales are down -- and ticket sales are sagging too. By Eric Boehlert
  • Payola City - In the wild world of urban radio, money buys hits -- and nobody asks questions. By Eric Boehlert
  • More waves in the radio business - Is corporate behemoth Clear Channel behind the latest shakeup? By Eric Boehlert
  • Suit: Clear Channel is an illegal monopoly - A tiny Denver promoter is taking the most powerful force in the music industry to court. By Eric Boehlert
  • Rock 'n' radio rumble - A dust-up involving Clear Channel and a Blink-182 concert in Cincinnati doesn't seem to be an isolated event. By Eric Boehler
  • Also See: Clearchannelsucks.org!, Cheap-Channel.com!, EvilRadioEmpire.com!, CheapChannelRadio, F-Clear Channel!, ReclaimTheMedia!, IndependentMediaNetwork, DenverRadioSucks:CheapChannel, PromiethusRadioProject, SanDiegoRadioSucks,

    URL watching -- Clear Channel Sucks

    http://www.clearchannelsucks.org

    Source: The San Diego Reader.

    According to the site's homepage, Clear Channel owns over 1200 radio stations and 37 television stations, while Clear Channel Entertainment (under the business name SFX) runs over 200 U.S. concert venues. This monopolization became possible after the Telecommunications Act of 1996 was passed, which reduced the limits on how many stations any one broadcast group could own.

    "This powerful company has grown unchecked, using their monopoly to control the entire music industry," warns the homepage. "If you find this alarming, ClearChannelSucks.org is the place for you."

    Launched in August 2002, much of the site's content comes from newspaper and website articles. An August 2002 piece by Eric Boehlert (first posted at Salon.com) entitled "Radio's Titan Hits the Skids" details the $8 billion company's recent stock problems (Clear Channel's stock lost 25 percent of its value in August after radio division chief Randy Michaels stepped down), as well as the Spanish Broadcasting System lawsuit, which is suing over alleged antitrust violations.

    Clint Sharp, the site's operator, wrote to me via e-mail, "I am a Republican, in fact I voted straight down party lines today; however, I am in favor of government overseeing industries which affect what we see and hear."

    Sharp says the Arkansas-based site has had over 296,000 hits to date and that the hardest aspect of maintaining the website is keeping up with the latest news. When asked if he is familiar with Clear Channel's recent activities in San Diego, he replied, "Only about their buying of Mexican stations...[which exceeds] the FCC limits."

    The FCC (Federal Communications Commission) still limits how many U.S. businesses can be owned by one corporation.

    "Rumors have it that they are broadcasting outside of their license limits from Mexico, but the Mexican government simply chooses to ignore it. In my opinion, their practices in San Diego are shady and outside the spirit of the law and regulations at best."

    Sharp believes there's little chance he'll be sued by Clear Channel.

    "We feel there is a good amount of legal precedent now for sites like ours. Sucks500.com has had two domains -- lockheedmartinsucks.com and michaelbloombergsucks.com -- enter into arbitration by people who felt like their trademarks were being infringed upon. They [the sites] were successful on both occasions at keeping their domain. Bally's Fitness sued the owner of ballysfitnesssucks.com in federal court for trademark infringement and lost. We are not making money off this site or attempting to dilute Clear Channel's trademark in any way."

    By clicking on "What Can I Do," site visitors are encouraged to "find out which stations in your area are Clear Channel stations. Then stop listening to those stations." Sharp particularly urges support for Senator Russell Feingold's Competition in Radio and Concert Industries Act, which he put forward in June. The act seeks to put a freeze on Clear Channel's monopolization of the radio and concert industries and bans anticompetitive behavior (with the penalty being revocation of radio broadcast licenses).


  • Navigate To Another Page!

    Home, Latest News, 2002 Archives, E-Mail